I’m following the arguments surrounding ISO 29119 with interest. It seems right up my employer’s street and I’ll be utterly unsurprised to find that someone in our practice has decided to shackle us to it once it emerges.
Once my current project draws to a close I’ll considering my options. I think I need somewhere to work that has greater vision and doesn’t limit me to being a “resource” that has to follow this difficult-to-follow set of rules
On August 12th I gave a talk at CAST 2014, the conference of the Association for Software Testing (AST) in New York, “Standards; promoting quality or restricting competition.” It was mainly about the new ISO 29119 software testing standard, though I also wove in arguments about ISTQB certification.
I was staggered at the response. Iain McCowatt asked what we should do in response. Karen Johnson proposed a petitition, which subsequently became two. Iain set up through the International Society for Software Testing (ISST), directly targetted at ISO.
I strongly commend both the petition and the manifesto to all testers.
Eric Proegler also set up an AST special interest group to monitor and review the issue.
This action was not confined to the conference. In the last three weeks…
View original post 1,453 more words